How to Upload to Steam Workshop Gmod Reddit 2017

The views expressed in this commodity are those of the author and do not necessarily stand for the views of, and should not be attributed to, Polygon every bit an organization. More on how Polygon writes opinion pieces.

The drive to exist on the bleeding border of applied science powers the PC gaming community. We desire zilch more than to run our ridiculously powerful rigs on barely stable beta drivers, with our CPUs overclocked to speeds that are neither advisable nor guaranteed to exist safe for our systems.

It's a good match for the ship-first-iterate-after arroyo of major Silicon Valley companies who want to expand at all costs and don't care what it takes.

Simply companies similar Uber, Lyft, Airbnb, Fiverr and the others are starting to feel the risk of that edge. The earth is finally realizing that a hands-off, profit-beginning, taxation-dodging "connexion and services platform," powered by the cheap labor of people who aren't technically employees and have no rights isn't exactly a good idea. In fact, information technology may exist a very bad 1. Whether this means regime regulators finally getting their act together, unions winning court cases or citizens voting them out of town, these companies are starting to feel the downside of moving fast and breaking things.

If you were to ask the average PC gamer, they'd swear up and downwards that there's no style they'd always requite their coin to such a corporation. They'd not only exist caught expressionless earlier helping a company like that come up to power, they might even bring together the resistance to stop them.

And yet, that sort of operation is exactly what the PC gaming customs has been supporting, promoting and defending since 2004 when Valve more or less forced us to install Steam by bundling it with Half-Life ii.

Behind the smile

Valve didn't e'er seem similar the sort of corporation which idea of its customers as meaningless numbers in a jumbo profit machine. How could it be, with its violent and innovative vision for digital distribution, its stable of influential first-party titles and its approachable, meme-friendly CEO? "Look," we said to each other, "yous can send Gabe Newell a funny email, and he may answer with a joke! What a adept guy. Valve is good."

Perhaps Good Guy Valve did be, at one time. But beneath the glassy smile of Good Guy Valve today lurks an altogether more common cold and corporate beast, a textbook rent-seeker that is profiting from both hostile practices and a bizarrely customer-supported near monopoly on PC game sales.

Steam looked very dissimilar in 2004

Reddit

Information technology seems increasingly unlikely that Practiced Guy Valve ever existed. Good Guy Valve is a clever marketing conceit, a car operating on a massive scale and one that tin only do so considering it is powered by the one thing Valve would later come to exploit to a higher place all: the gratis labor of adoring users and consumer goodwill that ofttimes feels both unearned and bottomless.

Valve controls an unprecedented slice of the PC gaming manufacture, and at that place can be no doubt that the power behind the throne is, and always has been, us. Skilful Guy Valve worked hard to make the states believe that willingly installing surveillance and control software onto our computers was a morally benevolent, peradventure fifty-fifty righteous deed — and we swallowed it hook, line and sinker.

All of this began when Valve released an easy way to keep Counter-Strike updated. And then Valve figured out it could get a lot of people using the software by making it a mandatory part of Half-Life 2. Here'south what ExtremeTech wrote in 2004:

In an unusual start for PC games, Half-Life ii will require some form of Net access upon installation, Valve Software'due south Doug Lombardi confirmed today.

"All versions require an Internet connexion upon installation" to evidence the legitimacy of a histrion's re-create, Lombardi said. "This is for authentication/anti-piracy purposes. One time this has been completed, the owner of either the retail or the Steam version can play One-half-Life two single player in offline manner."

We were so young and so.

Call back that even the retail version of Half-Life two required the installation of Steam, which means whatsoever store that sold PC software was selling you their doom with every copy of the game.

Anyone who wasn't immediately convinced it was worth information technology only needed a few minutes with One-half-Life ii to come across the error of their ways, reaching for the gravity gun to hurl a toilet into the face up of a Combine soldier, leaving the EULA unread and untouched but agreed-upon withal. Innovative titles like Team Fortress two and Left 4 Dead cemented the conclusion, reassuring us that our lopsided relationship with Valve had more benefits than it did drawbacks. Information technology was convenient. It worked. We didn't need to recollect about it.

Valve bought our loyalty with cloud-saves and claims of piracy as a client service issue. Steam gave a lot dorsum in the early on days, fifty-fifty when it was laying down the tracks for a lot of questionable decisions in the future. Nosotros also didn't want anything else once nosotros were comfortable with Steam, which is a large problem for anyone who doesn't want to give Valve a tertiary of every sale.

Get 'em while they're young

Steam's nearly monopoly has always been happily supported by players and even the press.

EA launched its Origin customer in 2011, and demanded that we install it if we wanted to play Battlefield iii. Our collective Stockholm Syndrome for Steam kicked in en masse, and we rained hellfire on this "greedy corporation" for its temerity.

"It seems similar the only redeeming characteristic of Origin is all the free stuff they requite away," a forum mail service from two years ago states. "Getting the Titanfall DLC for free was great and same with some old classic PC games like Wing Commander. But when you step back and look at the situation, it just doesn't make sense. They are giving abroad games, refunding the cleaved ones, and trying to manage all of this through a poorly designed digital game service. It only makes sense when you call back that EA is a greedy company that just wants more coin and more power, which they seem to animalism afterwards in an almost blinded similar fashion."

There is most a sense from the writing in 2011 that everyone should just whorl over and accept Steam. Not wanting to give another company a big chunk of your revenue in order to use their store is characterized as wanting "more coin and more power."

"Developers have sometimes complained about Valve'south hegemony in digital distribution and wished for seriously competitive alternatives," Geek.com wrote. "It appears that EA is taking this possibility very seriously with Origin, but it won't exactly be to gamers' benefit if in three years' fourth dimension all gaming PCs are running stores from Valve, EA, Blizzard, and Ubisoft at all times just so that players tin access their purchases."

Valve had all your information and was tracking your information, merely it would exist wrong for other companies to do so. Valve takes thirty percent of each sale on Steam, but anyone who wants to keep their ain acquirement is seen equally "greedy."

Expect into the face up of the devil

Origin

Looking back, it's strange to think how quickly even the most vocal Steam-haters came to terms with the idea of keeping Valve'due south software on their computer. Viii short years after feeling concern about ane forced DRM installation, we all of a sudden had null but vile antipathy for another, as if being forced to utilise one particular monopoly-surveillance-command channel was the most natural thing in the world, but the being of a second is untenable.

Steam is Good, and Origin is Bad. Steam is run by Good Guy Valve, and Origin is the devilspawn of EA, the Evil Corporation Who Doesn't Care Virtually You. We know these things to be true ... right?

No auction, no ownership, no refunds

We all somewhen discovered that our close, personal and entirely fictional relationship with Valve did not entitle u.s. to any kind of refund on our purchases.

Only it took the improve part of a decade for enough people to offset noticing that Steam's refund policy wasn't so much a "policy" equally the words "swallow shit and die" printed in huge size 72 font and to start raising hell about it. We were used to buying our PC games in stores, and we had recourse if they didn't work. Nosotros could go talk to someone. Steam never provided that luxury, and information technology however doesn't.

The occasional no-refund horror story was dismissed as the exception, non the dominion. It didn't cause near plenty to damage the Good Guy Valve gold brand, and an incredible 11 years passed before enough people were possessed of plenty indignant fury to actually complain to the regime.

Players began noting that was Valve was doing was wildly illegal, pointing out quite accurately that nether European Union police, consumers were entitled to a refund on all purchases — even for something equally unproblematic as changing their mind.

Never one to shy abroad from a piffling thing like "breaking the law," Good Guy Valve rapidly came up with a solution: an entirely new EULA custom made for the adept gamers of the Eu, which specifically acknowledges that they take a legal right to a refund ... and then immediately forces them to waive it if they want to purchase the game.

Eighteen months of drama unfolded in the Australian Federal Court from 2014 through 2016, as the Washington software giant used every fob in the book to stall the ongoing, inevitably damning case against it.

Valve, backed into a corner and hissing similar a cat that doesn't want to go to the vet, pulled out all the stops to avoid providing the required financial information — to the point where a seemingly infuriated and exasperated Approximate Edelman blasted Valve for "overkill" and issued the most politely worded legalese version of "become to hell" that anybody has ever committed to paper.

"If Valve's individual financial information is made public, Valve submits that it could brand negotiations with potential business organization partners more hard," the company tried to argue. The implication is that, were anyone to observe out how incredibly lucrative Steam had get, they might negotiate harder. The approximate wasn't having it.

"Even without examining the details of Valve's net profits, it is very difficult to see how any disclosure that Valve is a highly profitable business will come as a corking surprise to any fraudster, third party game programmer, potential business partner, patent troll, or supplier," Approximate Edelman wrote. "In that location are related matters to profitability that are already public information, which were discussed without any suggestion of confidentiality in the liability hearing. Those matters include that Valve has approximately 2.2 million subscriber accounts in Commonwealth of australia and that it operates in many countries worldwide."

Unsurprisingly, Good Guy Valve'due south defense — that they "don't operate a business in Australia," they merely sell things to Australians and have their money in return — also didn't hold up in court. In a landmark decision that set a precedent for establishing digital software as "goods," Edelman ruled that Valve was in clear violation of Australian law and needed to coughing upwardly $3 million in fines. The language was damning.

Justice Edelman besides took into account "Valve's civilization of compliance [which] was, and is, very poor". Valve'south evidence was 'agonizing' to the Court considering Valve 'formed a view … that it was not discipline to Australian law … and with the view that even if communication had been obtained that Valve was required to comply with the Australian law the advice might accept been ignored". He likewise noted that Valve had 'contested liability on almost every imaginable betoken'.

A landmark victory to be certain, but when even the near conservative estimates value Valve at more than than $iii billion (and that was in 2015), it's hard to imagine that Newell felt any kind of sting.

Fifty-fifty when Valve finally did get around to launching a refund program (a full ii years subsequently the supposedly evil EA did it!), many people quite accurately and angrily observed that the default refund option was in Steam credit, which means Valve wins either way. It'south almost like Good Guy Valve only ... doesn't want yous to have your coin back.

The linguistic communication Valve uses on Steam to this day reflects the pouty attitude the company has towards its loss in court.

European law principally provides a right of withdrawal on software sales. However, it tin be and typically is excluded for boxed software that has been opened and for digitally provided content in one case it has been fabricated available to the stop user. This is what happens when you lot brand a transaction on Steam: The European union statutory right of withdrawal ends the moment the content and services are added to your account.

At the same fourth dimension, Steam voluntarily offers refunds to all of its customers worldwide in a manner that is much more customer-friendly than our legal obligations. You lot can find the details here: http://store.steampowered.com/steam_refunds/

But Gabe, I thought nosotros were friends?

Shut up and accept my free labor

There is arguably no single phenomenon that more than exemplifies the lopsided and abusive relationship betwixt Adept Guy Valve and its customers than the Steam Sale.

Nosotros beloved the Steam Sales and the discounts they bring. Only possibly even more than we love the low, low prices, nosotros love The Auction Consequence itself. Nosotros love the pre-sale videos that we advisedly cut together to hype each other upward for the imminent spending spree. Nosotros love the in-jokes and the memes, the abiding barrack about the haemorrhage wallets and the screaming, tortured credit cards that just tin't take any more.

There's a word that people apply to describe "creating a sense of excitement to improve spending on an upcoming commercial event," and that word is "marketing." Marketing is a chore, and in the real earth, people go paid for information technology.

But in the globe of Good Guy Valve we requite that marketing away, for free, to a billion-dollar corporation every year (sometimes twice a year, if he asks nicely), doing our bit to help that corporation make more money during a sale upshot.

This is the terrifying power of Good Guy Valve. By positioning himself as the scrappy underdog who is "function of the community, rather than benevolently standing above it", he allows us to experience good about ourselves for helping out, allows us to play a joke on ourselves into a shared fiction of thinking nosotros're joining forces (as equals) in an of import fight.

"We have this kind of shared desire to build these types of entertainment experience, and everyone contributes in some way," Newell said. "Someone running a server out of their home using a DSL line on their PC is being philanthropic, merely we're colleagues of all of these people and that'south what game design needs to be."

We're colleagues in the sense that Valve gets our money and our labor, a topic nosotros'll talk more than about afterward. We do our part with the memes, the articles and the social media posts, and our good friend Valve does the rest. The residual meaning taking our money.

And so, after all that, we don't even play the games.

A beautiful friendship, where nosotros piece of work for free

Dorsum in 2011, Good Guy Valve tore up the playbook once more, showing u.s.a. in one case and for all that they weren't an uncaring corporation — in fact they wanted nothing more than to open up up their Steam Workshop and let us play around in their magical worlds of Dota ii, Team Fortress 2 and, later, Counter-Strike Get.

And you lot can earn real money from it, they told us! Purchase these items, and the 3D artists who made them will get 25 pct of the profits. We're all in this together!

Talented 3D artists surged out of the woodwork, and the airwaves were saturated with feel-skillful stories of creators making very decent, livable wages off the sales of Demoman swords, car gun skins and wacky couriers.

Valve themselves eagerly trumpeted that they had paid more than than $57 million to Steam Workshop creators over iv years — an enormously impressive figure until yous realize that it's merely 25 percent of the sale price, which ways Valve simply made $171 million profit from ... setting up an online form where you lot tin submit finished 3D models.

As far as Valve is concerned, it'southward a fantastic arrangement: Yous do all the hard work for free, knowing that you might never exist paid, merely hoping you lot will at some signal. This is called "speculative work" in the manufacture and it'due south hugely frowned upon as exploitative and unjust.

Valve sells your piece of work to other people, and they accept the overwhelming majority of the money from each transaction. Everyone's a winner ... but Valve, whose running costs for the store are essentially zero, and who have just tricked yous into joining their content subcontract, is the biggest winner. You're putting upwards your time and attempt, and those have a very real cost for you. Valve has lost nothing other than the sunk toll of the employee time spent maintaining the store, while gaining a lot of revenue.

The agreement itself states that y'all take no specific correct to any payment, exterior of the ability to upload the item.

"Except where otherwise provided in App-Specific Terms, you hold that Valve's consideration of your Workshop Contribution is your full bounty, and you are not entitled to whatsoever other rights or compensation in connexion with the rights granted to Valve and to other Subscribers," the understanding states. The specific Workshop agreement also forces you to keep the sales data itself confidential. Desire to tell someone how well your items are selling? Too bad.

"It'due south impossible for artists to live on the workshop lone anymore, something which Valve used to repeatedly brag about," explained one prominent Workshop creative person to me in an interview for this piece. Valve has but recently slashed royalties for Dota 2 creators to almost nothing, right on the eve of the next massive International tournament. According to this artist's guess, their share has gone down from 25 percentage to more like to v percent or seven percentage, and advice from Valve has been unclear or flat-out non-existent.

"Despite getting three times as many items in [to the latest Major], I'm getting a third less money," they continue. "Things are finer five times worse, and that'southward non factoring the fact that the sales themselves are worse."

This artist has made tens of thousands of dollars from Steam Workshop item sales, and is nonetheless in dearest with the thought of content cosmos and modding, fifty-fifty if they're not overly optimistic about the future of the Steam Workshop. They depict their human relationship with Valve's technical and tool back up team equally fantastic, but say at that place is e'er "zippo discussion" on anything financial. Or, to expect at things in a more cynical calorie-free: Valve is eager to provide the tools that enable yous to work for free ... but always has somewhere else to exist when yous desire to talk about payment.

"More experienced game artists, especially those at an AAA level, at present find that the workshop is non worth their fourth dimension anymore (and that's in calorie-free of the fact that information technology already was a large gamble before)," they add together. "This ways that the quality of the items will naturally get down. It feels similar many of Valve's decisions, really: short term profit for them, just it screws over the long term viability of everyone else."

The Dota 2 Workshop brings in a lot of money, and creators are getting less

Valve Software

Dota two continues to grow — not to the lowest degree of all considering the prize coin for the International tournaments is literally donated by usa, the players, who buy interactive Compendiums and Battle Passes to raise prize coin for the competitors (from which Valve takes 75 per centum).

When yous decide to support Dota ii, Good Guy Valve takes your money, puts 25 percent into the prize puddle for the players and keeps the residue for himself, and even then the prize pool was nearly $20 1000000 in 2016. I'thou certain y'all can exercise the math.

The numbers accept stopped adding upwards. The International is a huge draw, Dota 2 is the most popular game on Steam, Steam Workshop artists are now being paid much less, and all the while Valve seems to scream blue murder if you inquire impertinent questions similar "Hey, mind: exactly how much money are yous making?"

It gets worse. 4 years ago in the Dota two Kickoff Blood Update, Valve announced to the globe that Steam Workshop items could now exist re-sold on the Steam Community Market place. Detail creators would receive "a share of each resale of their detail," the splash folio promised, and those creators were excited at the possibilities.

The item re-sales are in full swing today, but that promised share of the profits for creators is still undelivered and Valve refuses to answer questions well-nigh where their coin is. We emailed Valve for a comment on this issue before publishing the story, and accept even so to hear back. After all, if y'all don't say anything, you can't tell a lie to the cyberspace, right?

The artist I spoke to only agreed to beingness published on the condition that they remain anonymous, and the reason for that is clear: Information technology's a adequately open undercover in the creator community that our friend Good Guy Valve doesn't accept kindly to being criticized (and in fact, when the time came to finally air their concerns in public, a group of Dota 2 workshop artists decided information technology was safer if they created an anonymous Reddit account to exercise it).

I asked this Steam Workshop creative person what rights they had when it came to disputing decisions or outcomes with Valve well-nigh their work.

"None," they answered.

The dream becomes a nightmare

Fourteen years afterwards Half-Life two — a game, past the way, that will likely never see a sequel unless information technology tin can be arranged with another leverageable platform — Good Guy Valve has smiled and exploited its fashion to a position of astonishing power and influence.

Even on an organizational level, Proficient Guy Valve seemed like Dream Guy Valve, who y'all would kill to piece of work for. Their famous internal handbook "leaked" in 2012, painting a cute picture of a free-spirited workplace where genuine creativity and absolute, unchecked innovation bubbled out like a freshwater leap in a magical wood.

Much like the ones on their famously mobile desks, the wheels on that particularly romanticized notion appear to have fallen off. Former Valve employees accept come out to slam the internal culture equally being a high-school like mix of cliques and backstabbing, with another engineer proverb it was "the worst experience of my life" and with desk setups similar to a "panopticon prison". Valve was even slapped with a courtroom case after one transgender employee declared that her supervisor constantly referred to her equally "it."

In fact, one of her key complaints in that court example is that Valve fired her later she raised concerns that the company was exploiting people who loved their products, in order to provide translation services for free. Sound familiar?

This, then, is Good Guy Valve — a corporation which employs precision-engineered psychological tools to trick people into giving them money in exchange for appurtenances they don't legally ain and may never actually employ while profiting from a whole lot of unpaid labor and speculative work ... but isn't "evil."

A company which will spend what has to be millions on legal fees to avert having to pay you $15 in refunds, but which isn't "evil." A company which exploits, underpays, deceives, obfuscates and refuses to cooperate at most every turn, only would never be caught dead doing "evil."

This is the Expert Guy everyone seems too afraid to call out, the toxic friend who is so popular that upsetting him will just make things worse for you, and then you convince yourself he'south really not that bad and that everyone else is over-reacting. One time the Good Guy illusion has disappeared, we're left with the uncomfortable truth: Valve is nothing more than ane of the new breed of digital rentiers, an unapologetic platform monopolist growing rich on its 30 pct cutting of every purchase — and all the while abrogating every shred of corporate or moral responsibility under the Uber-esque pretense of merely being a "platform that connects gamers to creators."

The imaginary Gabe, the one in our memes, is a cultural defence machinery, a happy fiction nosotros all invented to make us feel amend about the fact that we were, and remain, willing partners in installing PC gaming's biggest, most opaque, exploitative monopoly — one which we know deep down doesn't care near u.s. at all.

Perhaps it'due south time for all of u.s. to wake up.

---

Tim Colwill is a trade union officer by day, and the creator of satirical gaming site Point & Clickbait by night. He is, against his improve judgement, on Twitter .

younceonew1986.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.polygon.com/2017/5/16/15622366/valve-gabe-newell-sales-origin-destructive

Share this post